" /> granolapark: January 2007 Archives

« December 2006 | Main | February 2007 »

January 31, 2007

Vote Results

In the Ward 5 special election to replace Marc Elrich on the Takoma Park City Council, the People's Choice is Reuben Snipper.

The city website reports the unofficial tally as:

Alexandra Quéré Barrionuevo - 23 Votes
Eric Hensal - 72 Votes
Reuben Snipper - 107 Votes
Write-In - 1 Vote
Results to be Certified by the City Council on January 31, 200

This was the first use of the instant runoff system, but it apparently didn't kick in, as Mr. Snipper got the majority of votes.

A big thanks to Alexandra Quéré Barrionuevo and Eric Hensal for participating. As readers could see from the interviews here on granolapark (see previous posts), each had well thought out, passionate positions on the issues. We citizens are grateful for these neighbors who stuck their necks out and said they were willing to take on difficult, time-sapping, mostly-thankless job of city councilmember. If they are smart, Mr. Hensal and Ms Barrionuevo are feeling just a tiny bit relived.

- Gilbert

January 28, 2007

Candidate Eric Hensal

Dear Readers,

As a public service and at great personal expense and sacrifice, Your Gilbert is providing space for the Ward 5 Takoma Park City Council candidates: Alexandra Quéré Barrionuevo, Eric Hensal, and Reuben Snipper. Each candidate has been asked to respond to a questionnaire and their replies will be posted as they come in, each on its own page.

No, no, Dear Readers, don’t thank us! Not yet. Wait until we also tell you that we’re encouraging a dialog between readers and candidates here on these pages. Please add your comments and questions for the candidates.

NOW, you may thank us!

The election will be held Tuesday, January 30th, at Columbia Union College, Wilkinson Hall, 7600 Flower Avenue in Takoma Park. The polls will be open from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Links to additional information, including candidate photos and statements and a pdf download of a sample ballot can be found on the city web site.

We note that the ballot sample features candidates John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, and Ringo Starr (and write-in candidate Bob Dylan). We applaud the city staff’s sense of humor, but we wince slightly at the suggestion, once again, that Takoma Park is stuck in the 60s, man, and we hope next time, they use the names from a more recent well known band, the Sex Pistols, for example, or The Spice Girls.

By the way, as you can see from the comment posted to this (the ONE comment on all this candidate information! Ward 5 voters, have you no questions or comments for the candidates?)

- Gilbert

PS. This just in: as a comment from our relentless friends at FairVote notes (see comments section), this will be the very first city election to use instant runoff voting. That means you Ward 5 voters get to vote for your second, third, or fouth (if you write-in a name) choices This election is going to be SO FAIR, that there will actually be NO LOSERS! We ALL win! The city council podium is going to get pretty crowded!

___________________________________________


CANDIDATE Eric Hensal



Question: What is your opinion of the city's rent stabilization (rent control) ordinances? Do you support the revisions to the rent stabilization ordinance proposed by city housing policy consultant Kenneth Barr, Ph'd?

I support rent stabilization and the revisions put forward by Dr. Barr. The ordinance does need adjustment and his recommendations are balanced changes that will make the program more fair and efficient. In addition to rent stabilization, the city does need to examine how to strengthen and diversify our affordable housing efforts to make renting and owning homes more accessible to working families. I've heard from many renters who want to stay in Takoma Park but are unable to buy a home in the city and we should put more effort into working with residents who have rented in the city who want to move into home ownership.



Question: If you do not support rent control, what alternative form of affordable housing do you propose, if any?



Question: Should the city build a gymnasium? If "yes," what price limit would you place on the project?

Most residents I spoke with on this subject are frustrated with the city on this point. Residents are asking--how could the city spend so much money, go so far over budget, and have a building without a gym?

I think before we discuss the construction of a gymnasium, we should first have a complete investigation of the policies and procedures that lead to the cost overruns and schedule delays in the community center project. Without learning from past mistakes, a new gym will be a repeat of the past.
In the interim, we should look to available resources, such a existing school facilities, which may provide gymnasium access to the community.

Also, before undertaking new construction projects, I'd like to see the city adopt responsible contractor requirements for bidders. This would mean contractors would be required to participate in certified apprenticeship programs, provide health care, and fund pensions for construction workers on the job.



Question: Should the city keep all of its municipal departments: library, police, recreation, trash-collection/recycling, and so forth? If not, which should go?

First, any discussion of losing departments must begin with a commitment to city employees to protect their employment. It is easy to talk about letting programs and services go but we should consider and respect the work city employees provide the community and the commitment they have made to Takoma Park.

When Takoma Park was split between Montgomery and Prince Georges Counties, there were clear reasons why the city took on task of delivering many services. Now that we are wholly within Montgomery County, we should examine if there are services that can be transitioned to the county and at the same time, develop innovative programs that deliver new services to Takoma Park residents that are not available to county residents.



Question: What, in your opinion, is going to happen to the Washinton Adventist Hospital (WAH)? Will they go or stay? Would you encourage them to stay and if so, how? If WAH leaves, what should be done with the property?

I believe we have to approach this issue in a new way. It is not simply a matter of resuming negotiations to try to keep some of the the hospital here through a split facility. While opposing the hospital expansion and its traffic burden was an important stand, today we need to move away from opposition and realize the need to re-engage the community and WAH in a discussion about the future of the site. WAH has been in the city for one hundred years and we should work together to keep this asset in our community. However, if the hospital leaves, it should be on good terms and in a spirit of cooperation that puts a facility in its place that meets the essential needs of our community.



Question: What is your position on the WMATA development issue?

In order to best protect the city's interests, council members must make personal efforts to reach out to decision makers on WMATA board and the member governments to lobby for our positions. There are no straight lines of influence to have our opinions on the site's development taken into account. This requires coalition building with other constituencies and governments to ensure the site is developed in a way that best suits Takoma Park.



Question: What is your position on development in general in the city?

Development clearly should reflect the small town quality that Takoma Park has. New projects should be on a 'walkable' scale, integrated into the neighborhoods and provide a greater range of goods and services than we currently have in the city.



Question: Aside from the WAH issue, what development issues are there in Ward 5 and how do you plan on addressing them?

The largest potential changes for the ward, outside the hospital, revolve around future construction at Columbia Union College. The new facilities built on campus and their availability to the surrounding neighborhoods can create a great deal of change and potential opportunities for the ward. Also, although the project falls mostly outside of the ward, an obvious influence will be any future development in the Long Branch community and the potential Purple Line stop in the area.

These projects may be tremendous assets to our community, if we are part of the process early on and are an active participant in their development.



Question: In the recent elections, a number of Takoma Park politicians ran for and won higher office. Does higher office interest you and if so, how many terms do you think a city councilmember should serve before running for another office?

Term limits are for the voters to set. If a person runs and is elected, that is decided by voters who know the records of the candidates.



Question: Are there issues other than the ones discussed above that are important to you? Please describe!

I am a strong supporter of a municipal electric system for Takoma Park. Municipal electric utilities typically provide electricity to residents at a 30% discount from the area investor owned utility. This is a long term project that takes the most advantage of our status as a city and creates a service that will benefit everyone for generations to come. This includes local businesses, such as WAH, which would also benefit from the lower rates without government providing any tax subsidies. Also, a municipal electric company is supported by rate payers, so this will not be a project that will increase our taxes to provide the service..

Question: Is there a website, newspaper article or other public place where voters can learn about your positions? Is there an email address people can write to or a phone number to call through which voters can ask you about your campaign? (other than the city website page)?

eric@erichensal.org is my email address. I can also be reached at 301-920-1928.

Eric Hensal is endorsed by the Washington Metropolitan AFL-CIO. For more information visit www.dclabor.org

Eric Hensal

January 27, 2007

Candidate Alexandra Quéré Barrionuevo


CANDIDATE Alexandra Quéré Barrionuevo


Question: What is your opinion of the city's rent stabilization (rent control) ordinances? Do you support the revisions to the rent stabilization ordinance proposed by city housing policy consultant Kenneth Barr, Ph'd?

Takoma Park’s commitment to providing affordable housing and thus fostering a dynamic, diverse community is a laudable one and I support affordable housing goals as they further our citizens’ vision of fairness and caring. Over the past year, the City Council has begun to take a hard look at the current rent stabilization ordinance and I am sure that council will seriously consider Mr. Baar’s recommendations for revision to our rent stabilization in order to strengthen the ordinance. Overall, I support Mr. Baar’s recommendations as they will address some of the unfairness inherent in and potential legal issues with the existing ordinance that have arisen in recent years due to changes in utilities costs, property values, and the economy. Amending the current ordinance is a first step.

In the longer term, the city must undertake a comprehensive investigation of what affordable housing means to the community and what regulatory methods will best serve those interests. Using rent control as a mechanism to provide affordable housing has many pros and cons. The national experience with rent stabilization or “control” has not been a successful one. The consensus of economists is that rent control laws reduce the quality and quantity of available housing in areas exercising this power. We are seeing this maxim play out in Takoma Park now. The quality of the city’s rental stock is deteriorating as rental property owners defer needed maintenance and do not engage in improvements that would benefit tenants and the community. Many owners also are considering, or have made, the decision to exit the Takoma Park rental market, converting properties to condominiums - despite the fact that there is a surplus of condominiums in the DC metro area real estate market - thereby reducing the available rental stock to residents. Additionally, the burden of the current rent stabilization law is not shared equally by all our citizens and this is an issue of fairness that ought to be of concern to all of us. A purely economic selfish view of rent control from the vantage of homeownership is also unattractive. Rent control has the effect of reducing assessed value of rental property which is reflected in lower taxes on those properties, reducing funds available for city programs and services, resulting in increased taxes on homeowners and other businesses in the area to meet city budget needs.

Takoma Park’s rent stabilization ordinance reflects the community’s desire to ensure affordable housing for the less fortunate. Integral to a discussion of these matters is what the city means by affordable and who qualifies for the benefits being provided. The current rent stabilization ordinance, like others around the nation, employs no means test to ensure that the recipients of the benefit are actually in need of assistance. This does a disservice to the city’s mission as people who will most benefit from rent control often cannot obtain the benefit due to lack of availability. Our sense of fairness and justice should bristle at this disconnect.

As a member of city council serving the rental and homeowner community, I will seek to explore a variety of models, determining best practices from other communities around the nation in order to find an equitable, fair, and progressive solution to affordable housing in Takoma Park. The ultimate solution may be a variety of rent control, alone or in combination with other affordable housing techniques such as inclusionary zoning, relaxation of ordinance and code requirements, tax exemptions for nonprofit building owners, subsidies, and other methods being used across the nation. As a community we need to deliver on the commitment to deliver affordable housing in a way that benefits the entire community, not just a segment of it.



Question: If you do not support rent control, what alternative form of affordable housing do you propose, if any?



Question: Should the city build a gymnasium? If "yes," what price limit would you place on the project?

It is unfortunate that the gym was not included in the construction of the new community center. In keeping with the city’s desire to provide exceptional services and facilities a gym should still be planned. The scope and cost of the project are obvious sticking points. I would hate for the city to compromise the facility’s usefulness to fit into a particular cost structure. If we are going to do it, we ought to do it right, rather than merely build a structure in order to report that the promise to build was delivered. As far as costs go, I don’t have a set number in mind, I am open to the possibilities and will weigh the anticipated costs against the benefits to our residents.

The location and cost of the gym are of great importance to Ward 5 residents. For our children, accessing current facilities can is often be difficult as obtaining transportation can be an issue. We also should not wait for the gym to materialize to provide recreational services to our youth. I’d like to engage the county to negotiate for use of nearby properties, particularly Rolling Terrace, to provide local recreational opportunities for Ward 5 youngsters. We should also be exploring ways to provide transportation to existing facilities for our Ward 5 residents with need.



Question: Should the city keep all of its municipal departments: library, police, recreation, trash-collection/recycling, and so forth? If not, which should go?

This is an interesting question, with heavy bearing on the taxes we all pay for these services. An in-depth examination of the costs and benefits of each of these services would be required before proffering an opinion, however, the associated costs of these services would not be part of the needs analysis and quality evaluation. Each department’s merits should be evaluated objectively with full regard given to the value provided to the community. As Takoma Park provides a full panoply of services to the community, the city needs to be aggressively proactive in working with the county and the state to obtain financial reimbursement.

Of all the departments providing services to Ward 5, the police department is of the most critical interest as ensuring the safety of our citizens in their homes and on our streets is a top priority. I will work with the police to guarantee an increased presence in our neighborhood and greater community integration with the force. As a former commissioner of a park district that had significant issues with criminal activity, I can vouch for the positive difference effective community policing provides a community.



Question: What, in your opinion, is going to happen to the Washinton Adventist Hospital (WAH)? Will they go or stay? Would you encourage them to stay and if so, how? If WAH leaves, what should be done with the property?

Washington Adventist Hospital (WAH) is a vital part of our Takoma Park community and southern Montgomery County generally. The loss of this facility would have a grave impact on the health and welfare of the community. We must collaborate with WAH to find a workable solution. I think that, ultimately, if the city works with the board and engages surrounding communities served by the hospital in the conversation, WAH will stay. If the hospital does leave, the city will need to analyze how best to repurpose the property to provide the highest possible use and work to ensure optimal development of the site. That use may be as a hospital, greenspace, mixed-use residential, recreational, or business.



Question: What is your position on the WMATA development issue?

II am for development of the site in a manner that increases the facility’s usefulness to our citizens. Increased parking, cleaner safer bus bays, significantly improved access for the differently abled, and mixed-use development providing for shops and residential housing – with affordability measures built in – would be a boon to the area. Protection of the existing greenspace and sensitivity of the design to the existing neighborhood will be of critical importance. The current plan is untenable due to these deficiencies.



Question: What is your position on development in general in the city?

I believe that Takoma Park has the potential to be the premier community in southern Montgomery County - to be a cultural and residential destination location – while preserving the city’s historic and cultural character. I also believe, however, that Takoma Park may miss out on the positive benefits that development and increased property values are bringing to the area if it does not embrace a forward-looking agenda with regard to development.

We need to aggressively pursue a smart growth development model to enhance the city’s profile; promoting and supporting the opening of independent businesses and restaurants and the redevelopment of under-used areas and properties to create a more walkable, livable community. Doing so will allow the city to preserve the unique and historic aspects of Takoma Park while at the same time capturing and capitalizing on investment that will grow the community’s resources. Takoma Park is at a crossroads. The choices we make will determine whether the city becomes a beacon of success or a city left behind.



Question: Aside from the WAH issue, what development issues are there in Ward 5 and how do you plan on addressing them?

Other than WAH and the future vitality of the city’s downtown and New Hampshire Ave districts, encouraging the rehabilitation and beautification of our Ward 5 businesses and improving the quality and safety of our streets are of critical importance.

Building a vibrant Takoma Park isn’t just a downtown plan; our local businesses will be a valued part of a revitalized city. The Flower/Piney Branch corner & Flower/Erie businesses are exceedingly popular and the heavy usage they experience has resulted in a tired public face. These businesses will benefit from rehabilitation and beautification as well as changes to the streetscape and parking situation at the Flower/Piney Branch corner. The development that the owners of Beijing Delight are planning is an exciting first step. I will work with local businesses to provide them with consultative services and to locate funds to assist with property improvements.

Significantly improving the quality and safety of Ward 5 streets for pedestrians and motorists alike will be another top priority for me. Many of our local roads, including Flower Avenue and Sligo Creek Parkway have areas that need improved signage and new measures to slow the speed of traffic to prevent accidents. I’ve been lobbying for increased traffic control measures in the Flower/Piney Branch area for some time, contacting local and county officials and calling for action. As a city council member representing Ward 5, I will be empowered to ensure action is taken on a comprehensive basis.



Question: In the recent elections, a number of Takoma Park politicians ran for and won higher office. Does higher office interest you and if so, how many terms do you think a city councilmember should serve before running for another office?

I have no interest in attaining higher office. My concerns are local!



Question: Are there issues other than the ones discussed above that are important to you? Please describe!

Your questions and my answers captured the key areas of concerns that I’ve been hearing from Ward 5 voters. Public safety, rent control, the Takoma Metro station, and the future of Washington Adventist Hospital and of Takoma Park as a whole are the top menu items. Ward 5 residents are looking for an exciting, vibrant downtown with restaurants and shops, a safe environment for their families, and a continued commitment to being a progressive, leading-edge community with regard to its policies and programs. We must seek to enhance our community’s livability and expand our tax base, while preserving the historic and cultural character that make Takoma Park unique.

As an attorney with a wealth of public and private sector legal and business experience, including service as a public defender and a Park District Commissioner, I bring a unique set of skills and expertise to the table. I believe that my leadership, business, and legal skills will serve Ward 5 citizens extremely well as the city balances the complex challenges of maintaining the essential characteristics that make Takoma Park special, while embracing positive change to improve and grow our community.

Question: Is there a website, newspaper article or other public place where voters can learn about your positions? Is there an email address people can write to or a phone number to call through which voters can ask you about your campaign? (other than the city website page)?

Email: aqbarrionuevo@yahoo.com
Phone: 301-5883462

Alexandra Quéré Barrionuevo

January 26, 2007

Candidate Reuben Snipper


CANDIDATE Reuben Snipper



Question: What is your opinion of the city's rent stabilization (rent control) ordinances? Do you support the revisions to the rent stabilization ordinance proposed by city housing policy consultant Kenneth Barr, Ph'd?

I am in favor of "affordable housing" in both senses. That is, I strongly support the city's rent stabilization ordinance, especially with the revisions proposed by Dr. Barr. I also support discouraging "McMansions" in Takoma Park, so the character of our neighborhoods can be preserved. More specifically, I support Barr's proposals, but several of them are more like notions than actual legislative proposals. They need to be fleshed out considerably. I'm glad to see the City Council working with him on specifying the details.



Question: If you do not support rent control, what alternative form of affordable housing do you propose, if any?

I support rent control.



Question: Should the city build a gymnasium? If "yes," what price limit would you place on the project?

I think the city should have built the gym along with the community center. Given where we are now, though, I still support a gym, but only if a design can be developed that is "affordable". Of course, that is the question, what is "affordable"? Several considerations are important: the project the architect priced as roughly $8 million is more than a gym, it includes, for example, moving utility lines, changing the entrance to the police holding cells, changing parking, building a fitness room, etc. The gym itself is a relatively small portion of the total cost. Another issue is how much money we get from other sources, such as the state or county. If we were able to obtain substantial amounts of money from these other sources, then the total project would be more acceptable. Bottom line: I support a gym by itself that costs $1.5 to 2 million. But it is the cost of the other changes that need to be made that drive up the costs for the total project.



Question: Should the city keep all of its municipal departments: library, police, recreation, trash-collection/recycling, and so forth? If not, which should go?

The city should keep all its departments, but two things need to happen. First, we need to take advantage of the recent election officials at the state and county level who are from Takoma Park or who were elected with major campaign help by Takoma Park voters. Now is the time to pursue MUCH more actively fair reimbursement for services provided by the city. While the city is doing things to move this along, I think we need a major push to get changes in the payments and formulas used by the county and state. The TASDI report identified a number of ways to do this. This is an opportunity we should not miss.

Second, I've heard from the people in Ward 5 that they want major "tune-ups" of city services. For the police, things like: more emphasis on community policing, training of police officers on how to deal with teens, and an independent citizen oversight board to handle complaints. For the recreation department, more emphasis on mentoring of our children and youth in Ward 5 and better use of transportation such as the new van to transport Ward 5 residents to the Community Center. For public works, a better system for dealing with large objects, especially air conditioners and similar problematic appliances. I could go on, but that's the idea, let's improve our existing city services through these common sense ideas.



Question: What, in your opinion, is going to happen to the Washinton Adventist Hospital (WAH)? Will they go or stay? Would you encourage them to stay and if so, how? If WAH leaves, what should be done with the property?

WAH and a groups of citizens and members of the city council successfully negotiated an agreement for an expansion and modernization of the WAH facilities that would not overwhelm our streets with traffic. The plan included all the changes the hospital wanted except an enormous office building, rather the plan they and we agreed to was for a more modest-sized office building. When WAH went to their Board, they decided they wanted a much larger site, so they could expand substantially -- that is, the current 13 acre site was too small for future expansions and they wanted 25 acres. Where we are now is that WAH has not found such a site.

I believe, we can go back to the negotiating table and come up with a design for a split facility with a major portion at the current site and the rest located nearby. Can it work? Montgomery College was all ready to leave Takoma Park until they worked with a citizens group and came up with a split campus design that has been very successful. We won't know if that will work with WAH until we try.



Question: What is your position on the WMATA development issue?

I support development of the Takoma Metro site with a design that includes sufficient parking, bus bays, handicap access, green space, and traffic management. The design for the housing should be appropriate for the site -- for example, I do not support housing with 2-car garages right next to a Metro station, as in the current plan! I also think WMATA should use procedures that are open to citizen input to develop the plans, rather than the "behind closed doors" approach followed for the current design.



Question: What is your position on development in general in the city?

To me, the key to development in the city is that citizens should be heavily involved from the beginning. My experience is that when there is active citizen involvement, new ideas and approaches emerge that meet our needs and all issues get addressed. Citizens are much more likely to insist on addressing traffic, environmental, esthetic, and other issues.



Question: Aside from the WAH issue, what development issues are there in Ward 5 and how do you plan on addressing them?

The stores on Flower -- at Piney Branch and at Erie -- need attention. The city, and county, need to work with the owners to refurbish them. I talked with the contractor doing the survey work and we discussed the need for crosswalks and traffic control, better sidewalks, parking, facades that fit the character of the neighborhood, etc. Traffic on Sligo Creek Parkway, Flower, Carroll, Mississippi, and our neighborhood streets need coordinated action to control it. I fully support the kind of neighborhood traffic studies the City Council recently approved to deal with this issue on a larger basis than speed bumps on a single block.



Question: In the recent elections, a number of Takoma Park politicians ran for and won higher office. Does higher office interest you and if so, how many terms do you think a city councilmember should serve before running for another office?

I am not interested in "higher office". (I think Takoma Park is "higher" than those other offices anyway.)

On term limits: I have faith in the voters, I've noticed that the voters of Takoma Park have defeated several politicians when they thought it was time for a change.



Question: Are there issues other than the ones discussed above that are important to you? Please describe!

Thanks for the opportunity. I have several other issues that I want to work on, if elected. We need to strengthen environmental efforts. While the city has made considerable progress in its own operations, much more could be done. But equally important I think the city can do more to encourage individuals to maintain the environment, including urban habitat, control of runoff, bulk buying of energy efficient products, use of clean energy, tree planting, etc. We have many who are expert in these and many other ways to preserve and protect the environment and the city should make greater use of these resources.

We need to support our youth more. I want to engage more parents, high school and college students, and the city's recreation department in working with our children. Ward 5 has a lot of children and youth who need mentors and local programs, especially during the summer. While we have sports activities for these kids, we also need to partner them with young people and adults who can show our kids that the path to success is not just by becoming a star basketball player.

Finally, bus service: I've ridden the bus for the entire 26 years I've lived in the Washington area. Ward 5 residents are tired of late buses, broken buses, no buses, and buses "in pairs" (when two arrive together). We need to hold the county's "feet to the fire" to improve the service.

Can we do these things? If we work together, I think we can. Over the 20 years I've lived in Ward 5, I've worked with others in Takoma Park for everything from paths in Sligo Creek Park to reasonable development of the Takoma Metro site, from affordable housing to sensible modernization of the hospital, and many other issues. We've been successful because we've worked together on these issues. Takoma Park is full of people willing to work together to solve problems, not wait for someone else to fix them. I have the knowledge, commitment, and experience to work with others to make our community even better.

Question: Is there a website, newspaper article or other public place where voters can learn about your positions? Is there an email address people can write to or a phone number to call through which voters can ask you about your campaign? (other than the city website page)?

Website: www.reubensnipper.org
Email: rsnipper@email.com
Phone: 301-585-4103

Reuben Snipper

January 19, 2007

Snappy New Year!

Dear Readers,

The Takoma Park City Council started the new year snappily with a new suit, a new haircut, and second thoughts. The new suit was councilmember Bruce Williams’ (but he was back to the flannel shirt by the council’s second meeting of the year), the new haircut was councilmember Colleen Clay’s, and the second thoughts were councilmember Terry Seamen’s, though other councilmembers were on the same wavelength. He was wondering if the city really does need a new gym.

The cost of a new gym, to be built (perhaps, but less and less likely) next to the community center/municipal building/library, is estimated between 5.5 and 8.1 million dollars. In December the council discussed finding a way to cut back those estimated costs (see granolapark’s Gymnausium post).

It has come to his attention, he said during the first Council Comment of the new year (Jan. 8), that school gyms (located in the city, but controlled by the county), may be more available to the city than previously understood. That should be investigated thoroughly before plans proceed.

Councilmember Clay, who at past council meetings has debated at length the exact dimensions and materials of individual speed humps, made a new year’s resolution to restrain her tendency to micromanage. Considering her resolution she carefully weighed how to proceed with her next agenda item regarding the city recreation department. She was careful to make only a macro-management suggestion, though it was clearly agonizing, involving much tongue biting. The rec. department's problem is that, despite prior assurances that the city recreation department would be able to oversee the new community center facilities with the same staff and funding levels, there are problems.

Actually. there was one problem in particular. Councilmember Clay had arrived at the center to use a room she had booked to celebrate her child’s birthday, to find it had been double-booked, and the room unstaffed. This was her personal introduction to a situation that many people have complained about, apparently. Councilmembers Joy Austin-Lane and Terry Seamens both backed Clay up, saying they’ve also heard from constituents about staffing problems. The solution, they agreed, in a strictly macro-management way, of course, is that more funding is needed for staffing.

This is a difficult thing for fiscal-conservatives such as Clay to advocate, yet the need is obviously there. One wonders where the money will come from. This will only pump up the blood pressure of those who are already apoplectic about the community center’s costs and errors. Good thing the hospital is still here - have the ambulances standing by!

- Gilbert

January 08, 2007

Old Year Hangovers

Dear Readers,

Your Gilbert has been busy with holidays and a virus, so we will just have a quick year-end update of a couple of important city issues.

AS PREDICTED, the pitchfork and torch-wielding masses showed up at the Dec. 11th Takoma Park City Council meeting to complain about some aspect of the proposed rent stabilization reforms. Most of Gilbert’s other predictions came true as well, with the exception that no tears were shed (that could be seen). Landlords said “too little, too late,” and claimed that the reforms, though an improvement, still do not allow them to make a fair return - only getting rid of rent control would do that {See the Reader comment below that was posted to the recent granolapark entry "Fair Return"}. Tenants said the landlords, the corporate landlords, anyway, were liars, citing incidents of negligence, gouging, fraud, and bill padding.

The process staggers onwards. Mayor Porter says she is aiming at, but not promising, finishing up the process by late February or early March. Dr. Barr, the consultant who drafted the reforms, will return in January to tweak them. She assured everyone that there is still time for comment and input.

Also discussed at the Dec. 11 meeting, the last held in 2006, were the city gym funeral arrangements, er . . options. Following up on the previous week’s discussion of three plans, each costing several million dollars more than the city has, the council decided to keep the patient on life-support. Options such as a public forum/charette were suggested, a process similar to that out of which the Carroll Avenue improvement plan came. The main concern was informing every possible constituency. Nobody wants to develop a plan only to have a group of citizens come forth and say “hey,you didn’t ask US about this!”

So, watch for notifications of a public forum soon in the city newsletter and perhaps other venues. The Mayor herself may come banging on your door with an engraved invitation!

--Gilbert

PS. This thoughtful comment deserves to be featured:

My family has been on both sides of the Takoma Park rent stabilization coin. In December 2002 we moved from Florida to Takoma Park into a 2-bedroom apartment, paying $1100 a month plus electric, and $50 each per month for each of our two cats. We resided there four months until we moved to Beltsville where we could afford to purchase a house. We did not know Takoma Park had a Rent Stabilization law.

Fast-forward to May of 2005, when we actually purchased the twin building to the one in which we resided previously. While researching allowable rents on my building, I looked at the record for the apartment we had rented. The allowable rent was something like $680. And of course, at TP Landlord School you learn that pets are only worth $25 per month. So our family was charged almost double the allowable rent and pet fee. AND the city knew about it; in the sense that when that landlord (new to her job) submitted a rent report showing that she was charging me $1100 a month, the city wrote back to her saying that it was wrong. So she simply resubmitted the rent report with the allowable rent filled in. Our rent was not decreased nor were we offered any compensation. The city was satisfied and all was well in the Park. By the time I found out, that landlord was long gone and the building was under new ownership.

We are small investors. We expect a fair return on that investment. As of right now, Takoma Park doesn’t get affordable housing out of our facility because we can’t afford it. In order to pay the mortgage, up keep, and utility fees, we live in our building and rent out one unit at market rate.

I am also an honest and ethical landlord. I would never submit a falsified rent report or break the ordinances of the city. Because the only current option we have is dishonesty, we’ve met with a real estate agent to sell the place and get out of Takoma Park. We‘ll take our ethics and funds and find a more willing host.

There are many ways to address the need for affordable housing in a community. Holding a very few citizens responsible for the welfare many is not fair or reasonable. The current Rent Stabilization Law is unconstitutional (thus prompting the proposal at hand). I do understand that half the population of the city will be affected if rent stabilization in abolished without replacing it with another solution. I believe very strongly that another solution must be found and implemented as quickly as possible. In the mean time, in order to plug the hole in the dike, the city needs to provide immediate relief to owners of small buildings like mine. We would like to be a part of the solution, but time is running out. Small building owners cannot continue to operate with the losses we are forced to endure. Most are selling; many converting buildings to single family homes.

I do hope that we don’t have to wait until the council addresses the full proposal. It would not be difficult at all for them to enact an exemption for small buildings of 3-5 units or less. They could do it quickly for non-profits; they should be able to do it quickly for us.

Posted by: Angie Abraham | December 22, 2006 04:42 PM