N E W S

F E A T U R E S

C A L E N D A R

ANNOUNCEMENTS

O P I N I O N

P H O T O S

A R C H I V E S


R E S O U R C E
D I R E C T O R Y

R E A L  E S T A T E

C L A S S I F I E D S


A D V E R T I S E !

C O N T A C T  U S


E-MAIL L I S T S

VOICE • B L O G S

C O M M U N I T Y
L I N K S

News

State/federal team unveils three ICC proposals for public review

Three alternatives for the proposed Inter-county Connector, including not building at all, have made the cut for presentation to the public, a state-federal study team announced on October 30. A public hearing will be held next year on the suggestions after federal, state, and local agencies, as well as the public, review them, said Valerie Burnette Edgar, spokesperson for the State Highway Administration (SHA).

These alternatives were presented by the Inter-county Connector Study Team for the "next phase of study," according to a statement from the SHA. The controversial road is planned to connect interstates 270 and 95 or U.S. Route 1 corridors in Montgomery and Prince George's counties.

ICC planning studies began in 1979, but protests caused many delays. Former Gov. Parris Glendening finally stopped an environmental study of the proposed routes and vowed not to build it. Just three years later, it became a top priority of Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr., and this year, the U.S. Secretary of Transportation put the project on the fast track so that environmental studies can be completed in two years. Even now, the project attracts opponents.

"I'm concerned about the negative economic impact of this road on Prince George's County," said Peter A. Shapiro, chairperson of the Prince George's County Council. "It exacerbates the Ôregion divided' phenomenon."

Only already developed areas in Maryland would benefit from construction of the ICC, not those less developed inside the Beltway, Shapiro said.

Shapiro favors the study group's no-action alternative, which the SHA said will include "no substantial improvement...to east-west transportation facilities," other than those already contemplated in the region's master planning.

Two other options are in the running for public perusal. The first route would connect I-270 near Shady Grove to Route 1 south of Laurel, according to the SHA, generally following the master plans of both counties. The second alternative generally follows the same route, but it deviates at State Route 97 and curves east to cross I-95, ending either at Route 1 north or Muirkirk Road.

"Fooling around with the lines on a map isn't going to change the basic problems with the ICC," said Steve Caflisch, transportation chairperson for the Maryland Sierra Club. The master plan route goes through many environmentally sensitive stream valleys, including Rock Creek and Paint Branch, Caflisch said.

 
 

HOME NEWS FEATURES OPINION CLASSIFIEDS CALENDAR CONTACT US
Copyright 2004, Takoma Publishing, Inc.