N E W S

F E A T U R E S

C A L E N D A R

ANNOUNCEMENTS

O P I N I O N

P H O T O S

A R C H I V E S


R E S O U R C E
D I R E C T O R Y

R E A L  E S T A T E

C L A S S I F I E D S


A D V E R T I S E !

C O N T A C T  U S


E-MAIL L I S T S

VOICE • B L O G S

C O M M U N I T Y
L I N K S

News

Council supports Old Town garage

The City Council voted in a meeting on September 2 to submit an application for $300,000 from Maryland's Community Legacy Fund that would help finance the construction of a parking facility in Old Town.

The proposal includes preliminary plans for a three-level garage that would be on the block that stretches from Carroll and Laurel avenues to Eastern Avenue. The land is owned by landlord John Urciolo, who is developing just off of the property where the parking garage would be and needs 100 spaces to meet the county zoning requirement for his development. All the spaces in the lot would be metered.

Mayor Kathy Porter made clear that agreeing to submit an application for state funding in no way meant that they had agreed to allow Urciolo to build a garage.

The Community Legacy Fund supports private-public partnerships such as the one proposed by Urciolo and supported by Economic Community Development Director Sara Anne Daines.

Under the proposed deal, the $300,000 from the state would go towards the garage, and Urciolo would finance the remaining $650,000 in estimated construction costs. The city would then be required to pay the state back over 10 years with money made from the new parking meters. The city would pay Urciolo back over 20 years, 10 years after the state debt is paid, with no interest.

Urciolo said at the council meeting that he would be willing to let the debt stretch out over a longer period of time if the profits from the meters were not meeting the projections given in the proposal.

The council questioned the $30,000-per-year revenue predictions. If actual income from meters does not meet that projection, the city would be forced to pay back a loan from the state out of its own pocket.

Daines outlined the need for more parking, saying that if nothing changes within 800 feet of the proposed site, the Old Town area would be 71 parking spaces short of current Montgomery County development standards. "If additional commercial development were to occur in that area, primarily in restaurant, classroom, or theater space … there would be a deficit or need for 257 additional parking spaces," she said, citing a Takoma Area Transportation Plan study.

However, Daines admitted that the figure is a bit high, because the parking standards are the same used for locations such as Rockville Pike. The lowest estimate was 98 new spaces needed based on observed traffic.

"Places like Takoma Park, and Old Town and Takoma Junction specifically, are basically fully developed. So to require the same parking standards that you would in a more suburban area with additional vacant land is unrealistic," Daines said, explaining the reason for the discrepancy.

There are currently only 61 spaces in Old Town not designated for specific businesses, private residents, or Metro riders. All of those spaces are metered.

The three options discussed at the meeting were a surface lot, which would only provide the spaces necessary for Urciolo's development, a two tier lot, meaning a surface lot with one deck on top, and a three tier lot, which would have two decks and would be 24 to 28 feet tall. The proposal noted that it would cost 20 percent more to add decks later if you begin with just a surface lot than it does to begin by creating a lot with one or two decks.

The county zoning requirement for Urciolo's development is 123 spaces, but there is a standard 15 percent waiver for proximity to the Metro station, and another 10 percent is taken off because multiple businesses would be using the lot, and not all of them have the same operating hours. The number of necessary spaces was rounded to 100 for the purposes of the proposal.

Marc Elrich expressed concern that the city would take on the budget for the parking garage, but that it would end up only having enough spaces to serve the needs of Urciolo's tenants and their customers.

"I'm not comfortable because it's not clear to me that there are going to be any, or many, real spaces left over for anybody else to use, and it's not comfortable to me that the revenues are going to pay the bill on this thing," Elrich said.

But Urciolo said that a surface lot alone would add enough spaces to cover the county requirements, and any decks over it would be purely for the city.

"I had the right to close my lot off and only have my customers use it, even though I've been allowing everybody to use my lot," Urciolo said. "With this scenario, the city's going to make them public so everybody can use it."

City Manager Rick Finn supported the three tier proposal. "If you look at the two tier or the three tier, you're better off, from the city's perspective, to build a three tier because your risk is the same," he said. "You've got to pay that [$300,000] back, as we're proposing, in 10 years. You've got to pay John [Urciolo] back whatever the balance is after that 10 years."

Finn went on to explain to the council that Urciolo would be absorbing the carrying costs of the garage until it was paid off. "That in itself makes the three tier a better deal because you end up with more parking and you get the same risk that you had with a two tier."

 
 

HOME NEWS FEATURES OPINION CLASSIFIEDS CALENDAR CONTACT US
Copyright 2004, Takoma Publishing, Inc.