|
Ehrlich
Makes Mental Health Happy, But Tobacco, Cancer Programs Take
Hit
By
MARIA TSIGAS
Capital
News ServiceANNAPOLIS
Gov.
Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. kept his campaign promises and made
health care a priority when he released his proposed budget
Friday, but he also cut funding in half for both tobacco prevention
and cancer control programs.
More than
100 cancer funding advocates and survivors are expected to
rally at Ehrlich's office this morning asking for restoration
of $23 million for cancer control and anti-tobacco programs
in the 2004 budget.
Taken
as a whole, however, Ehrlich's health budget for 2004 rose
by $379 million, a 7 percent increase from fiscal year 2003.
The governor's
budget fully funds Medicaid, with an $128 million increase
in fiscal year 2004. Mental health services, an area that
has suffered under a deficit and repeated cuts, will receive
a $36 million boost in 2004, and gain $30 million this fiscal
year. Developmental disabilities services gained $38 million.
Ehrlich
made health funding a priority because "serving the people
who need it the most and helping the vulnerable and underserved
of Maryland," is one of the governor's goals, said James C.
"Chip" DiPaula Jr., Ehrlich's budget secretary nominee.
Some health
care services that have been ignored in the past are getting
their due.
"Mental
health services is an area that has been crying out for aid.
The dismantling of our public mental health system has made
services less accessible in this state," said Sen. Paula C.
Hollinger, D-Baltimore County, chairwoman of the Education,
Health and Environmental Committee.
"Overall,
we're extremely pleased with Governor Ehrlich's budget and
the funding he's providing for mental health services. Governor
(Parris) Glendening was not supportive of mental health services.
He chose to put money into Smart Growth and higher education
and was not very responsive to the needs of mental hygiene,"
said Barbara Bellack, executive director of National Alliance
for the Mentally Ill in Maryland.
Maryland's
public mental health care is in crisis, said Linda J. Raines,
executive director of the Mental Health Association of Maryland.
There is no room for cuts in Medicaid or mental health, she
said.
Raines
also praised Ehrlich for making mental health services a priority
"right out of the gate," and keeping his campaign promise
to issue an executive order stopping the practice of forcing
parents to relinquish custody of their special needs children
in order to receive services.
Ehrlich's
executive order, signed on his second full day in office,
establishes a council to find ways to keep families together
in such circumstances.
Cancer
funding advocates were not as effusive, but said they would
work with the budget given them.
Cancer
control programs -- colon, prostate, breast and cervical cancer
screenings, for example -- were cut from $17 million for 2003
to $8.6 million for 2004. Tobacco-use reduction programs,
including anti-smoking advertisements, dropped from $30 million
for 2003 to $15.2 million for 2004.
"For a
short-term savings, this budget will create a long-term nightmare
and burdens the state's Medicaid system," said Charles D.
Leiss, American Cancer Society's chief executive officer,
in a statement.
"We anticipated
severe cuts because of the condition of the state's deficit,"
said Arlene H. Stephenson, acting secretary of the Department
of Health and Mental Hygiene.
Ehrlich
was forced to close an estimated $1.7 billion budget gap when
he took office last week.
The Department
of Budget and Management worked closely with Ehrlich's transition
team. "They listened very closely," Stephenson said.
The department's
Cigarette Restitution Fund took a $30 million cut. The fund
was established in 1999 as result of a national tobacco settlement
with the states. Maryland lawmakers allocated $800 million
to the fund, with $30 million/year for 10 years going to tobacco
prevention programs and $50 million a year for 10 years going
to cancer control programs.
The $30
million cut meant "we would have to put off some projects
for a year," Stephenson said. That could include a million-dollar
contract recently granted to a Washington research firm to
evaluate the state's tobacco program.
"We looked
at how we could spread the cuts across various programs. We
tried to spread the pain," Stephenson added.
The director
of the health department's Cigarette Restitution Fund Program,
Carlessia A. Hussein, said, "We are clearly able to operate
at these numbers."
Media
counter marketing such as anti-tobacco ads are the type of
programs that will be trimmed, Hussein said.
However,
Kari Appler, director of Smoke Free Maryland, said the cuts
may appear minor but could have long-term consequences.
"Prevent
it now or pay for it later, in the form of disease," she said.
The cuts are "very disappointing," she said, adding that the
2003 funding, $30 million, was the minimum required by CDC
guidelines to run tobacco prevention and cessation programs.
"It will
be felt at the ground-level services," said Eric Gally, a
contract lobbyist for the American Cancer Society and the
American Heart Association. "People screened and treated in
2003, won't be in 2004."
1/22/03
|